Succeeding a great work is a tricky business, as works that attempt to do so are bounded by expectations: expectations of greatness, expectations of maintaining the status quo, expectations for doing something different. When you consider that expectations are not static, it becomes easy to see how complicated sequels are, with the rules bounding the works changing drastically given the circumstances of the work.
Enter Steins;Gate 0. It’s a successor to a beloved franchise, but given the circumstances, Steins;Gate 0 is a work bounded to these expectations more than usual. You see, despite the 0 in the name, Steins;Gate 0 is not a prequel, nor is it a sequel like one would expect. Instead it is a midquel that takes place during the game, near the end of the story… near the end of a work that never really needed any more material. In a world of serialized media, endings that are cohesive like in the original Steins;Gate are a rarity, and adding more to complete works like this run the risk of diluting the story. Has Steins;Gate 0 managed to beat the odds, fulfilling expectations that go counter against the nature of the work itself?
The answer to that, is thankfully, a resounding YES, exceeding many expectations that have been put in place, and it does this by doing something different entirely. They made the right decisions in almost every step of the way, adding to the existing story, while enriching what was already there. With a shift in focus and a shift in tone, Steins;Gate 0 manages to maintain everything that was great about the original while becoming a very different but equally compelling work by itself.
-Note: This is a review that assumes knowledge of the original Steins;Gate, so it will be hard to understand if you haven’t, and there will be spoilers. You have been warned. –
A key part of how Steins;Gate 0 manages to exceed expectations is because while the game is embedded in the original (telling a story that was crucial success of the original ending), it is drastically different than anything Steins;Gate had to offer: a character driven story instead of the plot driven story that we see in original Steins;Gate. While Steins;Gate 0 maintains all of the elements that made the original great, it is first and foremost a work of hesitation and reflection: Instead of telling being a grandiose tale about time travel and how it’s mechanics affects the fate of the world, Steins;Gate 0 looks at how these concepts impact the characters themselves, exploring the 0, the voids, the what ifs, the doubts that lead one to destruction.
This is all because we have a vastly different lens on the story: while Steins;Gate followed an Okabe entrenched in the persona known as *Hououin Kyouma*, Steins;Gate 0 follows an Okabe Rintarou that has been destroyed and traumatized after he fails to save Kurisu, failing to reach the promised Steins;Gate in the process. We see the story of an Okabe who is coping with the events that he was forced to see, attempting to live a normal life while ignoring the foreshadowed doom that lies in this world. It’s a story about devastation, regret, all told in a fashion that may remind you more of works like Muv-Luv and Welcome to the NHK more so than Steins;Gate itself, and it’s fantastic for it. It’s a difference in tone and presentation that makes all the difference, as the muted colors, the downtrodden character interactions shows the pain that Okabe deals with on a daily basis. This is story of loss and despair, one that forces you to live with the mistakes and pain that you have and all of this is very compelling because we saw what lead to it, and we are along for the ride.
Steins;Gate 0 is consistently more engaging because of this too: There’s less slice of life to slow the story down, the story is much more tonally consistent, and due to the nature of the story, it becomes easy to get attached with the cast. We are with Okabe: we experience the same events has he does in a similar fashion, forced to experience an alien world after we have witnessed despair, and the execution of this that’s what makes this character driven work great. We’re dealing with the differences in this shifted world just like he is, he is dealing with the distortions from memory and the reactions that come with it… and all of these elements bring this game to the next level, making it all that much more compelling. Add to this excellent character interactions, an excellent handling of characters throughout, and you’re left with an excellent story that can blow your mind, making you shout in excitement and greatness. The game has the skill to manipulate you. With every decision Steins;Gate 0 makes, the game very rarely makes a bad turn: it never ceases to amaze you, never failing to make you feel a way that only truly quality works can, always blowing your mind. I can’t even begin to count the amount of times where I declared how great this game was because of something it did, how much I fell in love with the game because of some of things, and this shift, this handling of a story is something I truly adore.
This happened in multiple routes too, as this game peaks at many points in the story. You see, unlike the original Steins;Gate which was linear with ends that branched off from the main path, Steins;Gate is structured more like a traditional VN with branching routes, and each branch tells it’s own story. From Gehenna’s Stigma to The Promised Rinascimento to the True End, there’s a lot of compelling stories that Steins;Gate 0 has to tell and for the most part, all of them are great. The way they play with different concepts, the events that they show, this game never ceases to impress. There are definitely weaker routes (Twin Automata comes to mind) but even those have their moments.
It’s also important to keep in mind that while the story is more character driven, It’s still Steins;Gate through and through: Steins;Gate 0 doesn’t just abandon Sci-Fi, instead using it as a base to improve the rest of the story. Steins;Gate 0 also adds Amadeus to the mix, a program that enables the digitization of the mind. Amadeus is a fantastic plot mechanic in Steins;Gate 0, a wonderful play on ideas that feel extremely natural in the world of Steins;Gate and is the core of both the premise to this story and the core of the Sci-Fi in Steins;Gate 0. Through Amadeus we see Steins;Gate 0 engaging with ideas such as how life can be prolonged through digitization, what it means to be human, what memories truly are, and how memories can be abused through the storage and distribution of them. Most importantly though, through Amadeus we get [Kurisu], a digitalized form of Makise Kurisu. Okabe becomes introduced to [Kurisu] and once again he is thrust into the world of science, conspiracy and time travel.
The handling of Amadeus and the characters show just one of the strengths of Steins;Gate 0 being a midquel: The only way it can add to the story is by expanding what already exists, and seeing it do so is great. Amedeus for an example, builds onto the original’s sci-fi elements by expanding on the basic premise of the phonewave, digitizing memory and implanting it elsewhere. Add to this the fact that Okabe has a hard time telling the difference between [Kurisu] and the original Kurisu, treating the AI like human, interesting to see and makes all that much more engaging. It’s a small tweak on the concepts that we saw in the past, but it is fascinating enough and shining example of how the premise of time travel and world lines, Steins;Gate is a game that created a world of infinite possibilities, with these endless possibilities allowing for the creation of side stories that can be ultimately as compelling (or even more compelling) than the original story itself.
Amedeus/[Kurisu] is also just a fantastic character. A perfect blend of robotic, the amazingness of Kurisu, and the quirks of character that come along with the knowledge that [Kurisu] is not the original all add up to make a lovable character that is amazing to talk to whenever you can. I’d have to say though, all of the new characters like the professor and Maho are great though, and they do this all without compromising the existing storyline or existing characters. They all have great personalities get development in a manner that makes most of them more than just cardboard cutouts, making characters definitely a strong point for Steins;Gate 0.
The presentation also goes a long way into making Steins;Gate 0 effective, an essential part of why it’s so great. The atmosphere that the visuals and sound create help you get absorbed into the work, and the presentation makes you feel the uncertainty and downtrodden nature that this work is laced in, making the story it’s trying to tell extremely effective. Even a quick look at the cover art will show you a stark difference in tone than the original, and I think it’s a change for the better. It does this all while continuing to do what the original did great: the music is once again phenomenal, being a joy to listen to and effective at manipulating your emotions to go along with the story, great backgrounds that is beautiful as ever, and the CG is really impressive. That being said, here is a few things that did bother me with the presentation this time: character art is very different, lacking the gradient that casted throughout S;G in the past. To me, it makes the characters stick out a bit too much, and this was hard for me to get used to given the familiarity of the previous games. Also, I played this on the vita and noticed technical issues with the effects: effects will show in the top left corner off sync with the rest of the screen for some reason, and sometimes frames will be completely torn. It doesn’t happen often and is definitely not enough to ruin the game but it’s worth noting. Overall though, the presentation is top notch and really helps to build the atmosphere of the game, helping tell the tale of Steins;Gate 0.
That being said, Steins;Gate 0 is not perfect: it has several flaws that can drastically impact your experience. Here’s a few:
- No longer linear: Not really a flaw by itself, but because of the entirely different routes, the work as a whole isn’t as cohesive because of this decision. For example, some of the impacts that this has are: elements of the story are left and forgotten, never to be developed, plot elements that were prominent in one are completely ignored in another, and more. All of these are little things make the side routes feel a bit hollow even if they are solid stories by themselves, and make the work feel like a more fractured experience.
- Slice of Life: A common complaint about the original Steins;Gate was that it took off slowly thanks to the slice of life there. While the slow start isn’t an issue with Steins;Gate, nor is SOL by itself an issue, the issue is how the slice of life is implemented: it feels increasingly out of place in the story, breaking the flow and cohesion of the story. Going from a Sci-Fi plot to SOL on the drop of the dime is annoying and the times it was implemented it didn’t even add much to the story. (Twin Automata, I’m looking at you.)
- Cons of a Midquel: Like every decision made, the decision to make the work a midquel has its pros and cons, and while I’d argue for the most part it was a good decision, there are definitely negatives. For one thing, this makes S;G 0 inherently a less repeatable experience, and will always stand as a lesser work to S;G as it is encapsulated by it. It also limited the scope of the game, as everything had to be a subset of the ideas in the original, not messing with anything that was established. They did a fantastic job, but these are worth noting.
- The Ending: This is probably the biggest issue with a midquel, being forced to conclude the story in a manner that does not impact the original story while trying to make a solid ending yourself. It’s a hard task, and i’d argue this is the only really disappointing aspect of this game, due to the very nature of the game itself. Being rushed and predictable, this ending doesn’t provide any catharsis, being over before it started. You already knew how it would go anyways, but what they offered was basically a half-assed fanservice measure.
Looking at everything that makes this game tick, it’s hard not to be impressed by Steins;Gate 0, and impressed I was. It’s a shining example of how concluding works should be, while also being a shining example of how things like tone, focus and presentation can drastically change a work. If you had a sliver of doubt that this game wouldn’t live up to the original, eliminate them: Steins;Gate 0 is a phenomenal game, a game so good that one can easily make the argument that it’s even better. If you asked me, I probably would.
PS: I wasn’t able to fit this in the review itself, but I wanted to mention this: Fun fact! Steins;Gate 0 isn’t a completely original game: it’s an alternate interpretation of the story told in the Light Novel Spinoff series, the Epigraph Trilogy. There’s significant changes here, but the basic premise is the same with Amadeus and that jazz.
- RockmanDash's Review
+ A Phenomenal Entry into the Steins;Gate Series
+ A Fantastic Character Driven Story
+ A Wonderful & Effective Presentation
- Predictable Ending
- Vita Technical Issues & Other Minor Stuff
I totally agree on how you felt regarding the ending. It was lackluster and half-assed — especially in comparison to “Kurisu’s” ending. I absolutely LOVED the revival of Hououin Kyouma at the end of that route, and it felt like fanservice done right. But I also remember thinking at the time that, while it was thrilling, it was too soon if I had yet to experience the true ending… A true ending that, by the way, didn’t even really feel like one. It was so tacked on and felt awkward… This is why the “Kurisu” route remains to be my absolute favorite that Steins;Gate 0 had to offer. From the sorrowful beginning, to the brief emergence of hope in the form of [Kurisu], to Okabe’s struggle with his short, heart-wrenching reunion with the real Kurisu, to his incredible time leaping journey from 2036 to 2011 and the plot twist he uncovered along the way, to the eventual renewal of his resolve and revival of his complete and true sense of self…
The true end doesn’t compare to that one.